Written by Erling Andersen
To effectively manage the risks posed by Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements, AML professionals can rely on advanced AML compliance software like Kyros AML Data Suite.
Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) are individuals who hold or have held prominent public positions or have affiliations with such positions. PEPs are considered to be at a higher risk of involvement in financial crimes, such as bribery. Also corruption, and money laundering, due to their access to public funds and power.
Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) are defined differently by various regulatory bodies.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) defines PEPs as “individuals who entrusted with prominent public functions, either domestically or internationally.”
The European Union’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (4AMLD) provides a broader definition.
This Definition includes not only current and former government officials but also their family members and close associates. In essence, a PEP is someone who has a position of influence, which exploited to launder money or engage in other financial crimes.
The concept of Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) emerged in the 1990s as part of the international community’s efforts to combat money laundering. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental organization established in 1989 to develop policies to combat money laundering. First introduced the idea of PEPs in 1999.
At the time, the FATF recognized that public officials, especially those in high-ranking positions. At a higher risk of involvement in financial crimes due to their access to public funds and power. As a result, the FATF issued a recommendation that financial institutions conduct Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) on PEPs to mitigate the risks of money laundering and other financial crimes.
Since then, the concept of PEPs adopted by regulatory bodies around the world, including the European Union. Alsoย the United Nations, and the United States. In 2001, the USA PATRIOT Act required financial institutions to identify and report suspicious activities, including transactions involving PEPs.
The importance of PEPs became more evident after the terrorism attacks in the US. In response, the international community increased its efforts to combat terrorism financing, which included a focus on PEPs. The FATF issued a special recommendation on terrorism financing in 2001. It called for increased scrutiny of PEPs’ financial activities.
Over the years, the definition of PEPs has expanded to include not only current and former government officials but also their family members and close associates.
The European Union’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (4AMLD), which came into effect in 2017. It defines PEPs as “natural personsย who are entrusted with prominent public functions, such as heads of state or government. Also senior politicians, senior government, judicial or military officials. Additionally senior executives of state-owned corporations, important political party officials.”
Today, PEPs continue to be a focus of regulatory bodies and financial institutions’ efforts to combat financial crimes. As the world becomes more interconnected, the risks associated with financial crimes. Also including those involving PEPs, continue to grow. Regulatory bodies are increasing their focus on AML compliance. Also financial institutions are investing in new technologies to mitigate the risks.
“PEPs present a higher risk of involvement in bribery and corruption due to their access to public funds and power.”
KPMG
Here are some practical examples of how financial institutions conduct enhanced due diligence (EDD) on Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) to mitigate the risks of financial crimes:
There is limited publicly available statistical data specifically on Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) and their involvement in financial crimes. However, here are some relevant statistics related to PEPs and financial crime:
While these statistics do not specifically focus on PEPs, they highlight the pervasive nature of financial crime and corruption, which PEPs are at a higher risk of being involved in due to their access to public funds and power. It underscores the importance of regulatory bodies and financial institutions’ efforts to conduct enhanced due diligence on PEPs to mitigate the risks of financial crimes.
“PEPs are a high-risk category for financial institutions and require enhanced due diligence measures.”
Thomson Reuters
As the world becomes more interconnected, the risks associated with financial crimes, including those involving PEPs, continue to grow. In response, regulatory bodies are increasing their focus on AML compliance, and financial institutions are investing in new technologies to mitigate the risks.
The use of blockchain technology is gaining popularity as a means of preventing financial crimes. Blockchain technologyย used to create an immutable record of transactions, which easily audited and traced. This can help financial institutions to identify suspicious transactions involving PEPs and other high-risk individuals.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used by financial institutions to detect and prevent financial crimes. AI can analyze vast amounts of data and identify patterns that may be indicative of money laundering or other financial crimes. This can help financial institutions to identify suspicious transactions involving PEPs and other high-risk individuals.
Regulatory bodies are continuously updating their AML regulations to keep pace with the changing nature of financial crimes. For instance, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network FinCEN US has proposed new rules that would require financial institutions to verify the identity of PEPs at the time of account opening and monitor their transactions for suspicious activity.
Financial institutions are increasingly collaborating with each other and with regulatory bodies to combat financial crimes. This can help to identify suspicious transactions involving PEPs and other high-risk individuals and prevent them from being used for illicit purposes.
As the risks associated with financial crimes continue to grow, financial institutions are placing greater emphasis on customer due diligenceย This includes conducting enhanced due diligence on PEPs and other high-risk individuals to mitigate the risks of financial crimes.
Kyros AML Data Suite is a powerful AML compliance SaaS software that can help financial institutions to comply with AML regulations. Also mitigate the risks of financial crimes involving PEPs and other high-risk individuals. With its advanced AI and machine learning capabilities, Kyros AML Data Suite can analyze vast amounts of data and identify suspicious transactions quickly and accurately. This can help financial institutions to reduce the risk of financial crimes. Also avoid regulatory fines, and protect their reputation.
Some of the many benefits of Kyros AML Data Suite include:
For more information about Kyros AML Data Suite and how it can help your financial institution to mitigate the risks of financial crimes involving PEPs and other high-risk individuals, visit kyrosaml.com.
"The fight against money laundering and terrorist financing is a global responsibility that requires collaboration and commitment from all nations."-...
"The presence of a robust regulatory backstop is instrumental in fostering confidence in the financial system and preventing systemic failures."...
"The Customer Identification Program is not just a regulatory obligation; it is a critical tool in the fight against financial...
he Ultimate Beneficial Ownership (UBO) Registry plays a crucial role in identifying the individuals who ultimately own or control a...
Non-Financial Businesses and Professions (NFBPs) encompass a wide range of industries and occupations that are vulnerable to money laundering and...
Front companies serve as a deceptive facade for illicit activities, allowing individuals or organizations to conceal their true intentions or...
Book a 20 minutes discovery call now.